The votes of dissident members wouldn't be counted- Supreme Court announced majority verdict
SC announced 3-2 majority decision in presidential reference to interpret article 63-A of the constitution
The five
member larger bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan announced majority
decision in the presidential reference and declared that votes of the dissident
members cannot be counted. The presidential reference was filed by president to
seek legal advice of the apex Court in the article 63(A) of the constitution. The
3-2 majority decision of the SC said that Article 63(A) of the constitution should
be read with Article 17 of the constitution. The reference was filed in the
apex court in March after the Opposition parties submitted a no-trust motion
against the then prime minister Imran Khan.
The
president asked four questions in the reference. The SC answered three out of
four questions. The SC bench didn’t address the question of life time disqualification
for dissident members and send this issue to parliament.
Can defected
parliamentarians be allowed to vote?
Will
defected MPs vote be given equal weightage?
Can defected
MPs be disqualified for life?
Other
measures that can be taken to curb vote-buying?
In the
majority verdict of 3:2, CJP Umar Atta Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, and
Justice Munib Akhtar agreed that dissident members' votes should not be
counted, while Justice Jamal Mandokhail and Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel
disagreed with the verdict.
In response
to the first and second questions raised in the reference, the top court's
majority judgement said the votes of the defected parliamentarians would not be
counted.
In response
to the third question regarding the disqualification of members, the top court
rejected the PTI's plea, saving the lawmakers from permanently being barred
from the Parliament.
In its opinion on the fourth question, the three judges said that it was the right time for the Parliament to legislate on lifetime disqualification and make laws in relation to curbing horse-trading.
The PTI
government had approached the SC in a bid to stop its dissenting lawmakers from
voting against Imran Khan and had sought a lifetime disqualification for those
who attempted to deviate from the party's direction.
What is
Article 63(A)?
Article
63(A) of the Constitution of Pakistan deals with the defection of
parliamentarians.
According to
the article, a lawmaker can be disqualified on the grounds of defection if they
vote or abstain from voting in the House contrary to any direction issued by
the parliamentary party to which they belong.
However,
this is restricted to three instances where they have to follow the party’s
directions:
Election of
the prime minister or chief minister;
Vote of
confidence or a vote of no-confidence;
Money bill
or a Constitution (amendment) bill.
Per the
article, the head of the party is required to present a written declaration
that the MNA or MPA concerned has defected.
However,
prior to presenting the declaration, the head of the party will have to give
the MNA or MPA concerned a chance to explain the reasons for defection?
Following
that, the party chief will then forward the written declaration to the speaker,
who would, in turn, hand it over to the chief election commissioner (CEC).
The CEC will
have 30 days at their disposal to confirm the declaration. Once confirmed, the
MNA or MPA concerned will no longer be a member of the House and their “seat shall
become vacant".
Post a Comment