SAPM on accountability Shahzad Akbar made sugar inquiry report public
Farmers and consumers were exploited to maximise profits
Special
Assistant of Prime Minister (SAPM) on accountability and interior Shahzad Akbar
today in a press conference made the findings of the sugar crisis inquiry
public. He said that the prime minister and the Cabinet have declared the
report public and it will be available on the Press Information Department
(PID) website.
He said today
marks an important day. "Neither have investigations been conducted over
matters such as these in the past, nor has any government had the courage to
make the investigations public."
He said that
the report "has some very shocking findings", from sugarcane
procurement and sugar manufacturing to sale and exports.
He gives the
background on the formation of inquiry report and said that the sugar inquiry
commission was set up because there has been a cycle of sugar price increases
from December 2018 to August 2019, where prices were hiked up to 33%, which, in
rupee terms, translates to Rs 17 per kilogramme.
"In
view of the rise in prices, the premier set up a three-member inquiry committee
under FIA DG Wajid Zia and which presented a detailed report to the prime
minister, wherein problems associated with the sugar industry that were causing
price hikes were highlighted."
He said that DG anti-corruption Punjab and one member each from Intelligence
Bureau (IB), Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Security and Exchange
Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) were made part
of the committee.
"This
commission worked for a very brief period and submitted a final report to the
cabinet and today, a special cabinet meeting was called.
SAPM on
accountability further said that "In the meeting, Wajid Zia, the head of
commission, presented the report and then the cabinet had a detailed discussion
and the cabinet was briefed on the basic points of the report and what
recommendations have been included, which I'll share in a bit. I request you
all please patiently listen,"
"You
can see clearly in this report how a business group has captured this whole
industry and that includes institutional capture, regulatory capture, and it
has paralysed the entire system and put the ultimate burden on the
people," he said.
The role of Sharifs,
Jahangir Tareen, Khusro Bakhtiar and Moonis Elahi
SAPM
barrister Shahzad Akbar named Shahbaz Sharif's family, Jahangir Tareen, Khusro
Bakhtiar and Moonis Elahi while discussing the findings. He said that the
company owned by Shahbaz Sharif's family engaged in "double
reporting". In 2017-18, the company raked in additional profits of Rs1.3bn
and when 2018-19, they earned Rs780 million.
Shahzad Akbar
said sugar mills belonging to Jahangir Tareen's group were found guilty of
"double billing" and "over-invoicing" as well as
"corporate fraud".
Speaking of
Khusro Bakhtiar's brother, he said that Omar Shehryar is the one who owns a
sugar mill and does not hold political office. "We cannot ask Khusro
Bakhtiar to resign from his post (as minister for food security). An inquiry
will be initiated against whoever is directly involved."
He said among the mills short listed is Alliance which is owned by the RYK Group. Moonis Elahi has 34% ownership of the group.
He said among the mills short listed is Alliance which is owned by the RYK Group. Moonis Elahi has 34% ownership of the group.
SAPM on
accountability provided details of the six major parties in the sugar industry,
JDW has 20% (the biggest share), RYK
12%, Al Moiz Group 6.8%, Tanliawal Group 5%, Sharifs Group 4.5% and Omni Group
1.6%.
Akbar said a
subsidy of Rs29bn was given to the sugar industry in the last five year. The
total income tax of around 88 sugar mills of the country is Rs10bn, after
getting a tax refund.
Akbar said
that the report "has some very shocking findings", from sugarcane
procurement and sugar manufacturing to sale and exports.
Continued
looting and exploitation of farmers
The SAPM
said that "the first finding which is important in this report is that the
farmer, the person who grows sugarcane, was consistently harmed and was looted.
Sugar mills systematically paid extremely low prices-lower than even the
support prices." He said that with a support price set by the government
at Rs 190, the farmers were only paid Rs140 all through 2019.
He further
said almost all mills cut down sugarcane weight by 15-30%, which directly
impacts the farmers, because by purposefully weighing it lower, the gain goes
to the sugar mill owners.
He also said
that it was found that some mills had a system whereby rough receipts were
used. "Instead of a CPR (computerised payment receipt), farmers are given
unofficial receipts which are lower than Rs140." He said that while
purchasing, commission agents are used (as middlemen) which allows for
sugarcane to be purchased from farmers at an even lower price.
SAPM Shahzad
Akbar explained that sugarcane is bought from the farmers on lower prices and
the cost is presented higher while recording cost of production.
"This
is the most important factor because mill owners show cost of production as
higher than support price when, in reality, the commission has obtained
evidence through the forensic audit which shows sugarcane is purchased on lower
prices and farmers are paid lower prices," he said.
"It is
also observed that mill owners engage in unofficial banking with farmers
wherein they (mill owners) give advance money to farmers under the category of
fertiliser, and in the category, since it is not regulated banking, up to 35%
profits are received. "
Cost of
production manipulated
"A
major finding is manipulation in cost. Ex-mill cost, which is the cost of
production was a major point determined by the commission. "According to
the report, there has never been an independent assessment of cost of
production of 1 kilogramme of sugar ever before today," he said.
He said it
was determined that since forever, government institutions rely on the estimate
given by the Pakistan Sugar mills Association, whereas it is the responsibility
of the government institutions and regulators to determine how much it costs to
produce a kilogramme of sugar.
Akbar said a
clear difference has been observed in what the commission counted as cost of
production and what figures the sugar mill association provided. "I'll
provide the figures from the past 3 years presented in the commission report
and you can understand," Akbar said.
It's
the cost of production on the basis of ex- mill price — it doesn't include the
tax — so the cost of production for 2017-18 provided by the sugar mills now and
in the past is Rs51 per kilogramme, whereas the forensic audit commission
determined this as Rs38, a difference of Rs13.
"Similarly,
the cost of production for 2018-19 determined by the sugar mills association —
which is not done independently but done by mills themselves — was Rs52.06,
whereas the forensic audit commission determined it as Rs40.06. This shows a
difference of more than Rs12."
He said that
in 2019-20 sugar mill price determination before taxation is Rs62, whereas the
price determined by commission is Rs40.04 — a very clear difference.
He said the
commission found ‘over-invoicing of sugarcane procurement’ — that sugarcane is
being purchased on lower price and shown in the books at a higher price.
The Omni
Group benefited
He said that
the commission also evaluated in the forensic audit how much subsidy was given
to mills for exports. He said "gross injustice" had been
committed in Sindh whereby the subsidy "was tailored to benefit Omni
Group".
He said this
year’s subsidy from Sindh worth Rs9.3bn was given “to all mills” versus a first
come, first-served basis. He said this way the company with the biggest share
in Sindh, Omni Group, benefitted.
Post a Comment