Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s 15 questions regarding appointment and assets of accountability wizard
10 member SC bench will resume the hearing of Justice Isa's case on June 02
Justice Qazi Faez Isa has raised 15 questions regarding the
appointment, assets, tax returns and nationality of SAPM Barrister Shahzad
Akbar as a head of Asset Recovery Unit (ACU) in a rejoinder submitted to the Supreme
Court. Justice Qazi Faez Isa is the senior most Supreme Court judge and will
become next Chief Justice of Pakistan after the retirement of current Chief
Justice.
President of Pakistan Dr Arif Alvi had filed a reference
against Justice Qazi Faez Isa in Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) on the advice
of PM Imran Khan for not declaring the property owned by his family members in
London. Justice Isa has challenged the presidential reference filed against him
in the Supreme Judicial Council and filed a petition in the SC saying the case
was based on mala fide intent.
The first question raised by Justice Faez is regarding the
appointment of barrister Shahzad Akbar. “Who appointed Shahzad Akbar?” asked
the Justice Isa. “Did the government announce the vacancy in newspapers or were
applications sought for the appointment of the chairman of the Asset Recovery
Unit?”
Justice Faez Isa, also sought to know whether Akbar's
appointment was made through Federal Public Service Commission and if answers
to these four questions are in negative, then how he had been appointed as the
ARU head. He also asked authorities to share the terms and conditions of his
job.
“Is Shahzad Akbar a Pakistani or does he hold dual
nationality?” asked Justice Isa.
Seeking information about
SAPM’s tax details, the SC judge
asked why he has not made anything public about his family members and the
nationality they hold.
“What’s his income tax and wealth status and from when he
started submitting his tax returns?”
In another question, Justice Isa asked about the bank
details, properties and assets owned by the prime minister’s special assistant
on accountability.
Justice Isa also demanded the information about the assets
owned by SAPM Akbar’s family and whether he has declared these in his returns
or not.
The SC judge said that ARU is an illegal entity and the
money spent on it is a ‘theft’ of public money and the unit collected the
information about him through unlawful means.
A 10-member judge bench, led by Justice Umar Ata Bandial,
will resume hearing the case on June 2, which was earlier scheduled to be taken
up on March 30. The apex court had postponed the hearing due to the coronavirus
pandemic.
Special correspondent
Post a Comment